Ok. So I've had some time this afternoon to play around with some of the third-party tie in's that exist between blogger and the rest of the web. The idea behind all these "Web 2.0" services is interaction and data exchange, right? I want in on the game.
Anyway, the outcomes so far have been fairly disappointing, not directly because the third-party extensions aren't well engineered; indeed, the mobile offerings from
Flickr and the software from
Picasa (Google) are
very nice and extremely easy to use.
There's a hitch though. I host my own blog on my own web server with my own FTP information, and for
some reason when I post media items from third party sites on my Blogger-driven blog, I need to manually "publish" everything via their web interface before my new materials become apparently on this site.
On its face, that isn't a problem if I'm using Picasa as that's a Windows-based software package. (Translation: You use Picasa on Windows, ergo you're probably also in a position to manually publish your blog through the blogger site from that Windows system).
But the attraction that I see for Flickr, in particular, is the mobile aspect of their service. You see, I should be theoretically able to use my camera phone to take a photo, which I can then MMS to Flickr which in turns posts it to my blog.
Now, if I was using the traditional Blogger service, I'm sure this would work. But in my circumstance, the new post
is created by Flickr once my photo MMS is received, but it isn't
published. Meaning, the new post is logged into the Blogger system and is ready, but isn't visible to readers because it isn't
published. To finish the job
, I need a net connection and a PC, which sort of takes the point out of mobile publishing of photos directly from my camera phone. After all, if I had a PC handy, wouldn't I just use it for publishing the photos directly?
Anyway, I'll continue digging and see if there are ways around this limitation, either through the Google Blogger API or via some client-side scripting to digest the Flickr feed directly. Neither represents an ideal scenario, in my opinion, but these two options could yield a method for posting photos (and eventually videos) remotely. This isn't game over yet.